Thursday, November 29, 2012

Newt Gingrich Slams House Republicans For Negotiating With President Obama: ‘Get A Grip!’


Listen to the man, he makes plenty of sense.

HuffPo.com:
Former GOP Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich urged Republicans on Wednesday to simply "back out" of all negotiations with President Barack Obama to avert the fiscal cliff, saying that they were ceding their leverage by even talking with the White House.

“My number one bit of advice to the congressional Republicans is simple: Back out of all of this negotiating with Obama," Gingrich said at a speech at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum in Simi Valley, Calif., according to the Daily Caller. "The president is overwhelmingly dominant in the news media.

You start setting up the definition of success [as] finding an agreement with Obama, you just gave Obama the ability to say to you, ‘Not good enough.’”

Gingrich portrayed the fiscal cliff as a "fantasy" Democrats are using to push higher marginal tax rates on the wealthy while squeezing out the GOP's goals of large-scale entitlement reform and spending cuts, and said congressional Republicans were actually in the driver's seat.

“One of the things I would say to House Republicans is to get a grip,” Gingrich said, according to the Ventura County Star. “They are the majority. They’re not the minority. They don't need to cave in to Obama. They don't need to form a surrender caucus.”

Gingrich made a similar argument in the wake of the elections, telling Human Events that GOP leaders should approach the decision to enter negotiations on the fiscal cliff with caution.

“Republicans have to insist that there were two mandates on Election Day. There’s a mandate for Obama and there is a mandate for House Republicans. So, it’s important to put in context that they are meeting as equals to talk about the country," Gingrich advised in an interview with the outlet. "They are not working for Obama, but they are willing to work with Obama.”
RELATED:  Krauthammer’s Take: Geithner Deal ‘Insulting,’ GOP Should Walk Away

Megachurch Pastor Rick Warren To Piers Morgan: Being Gay Is Like Taking Arsenic


It's always funny watching how white, anti-God, social liberals react when taking on a man of the cloth, as if they're really just shocked that a person who has dedicated his life to God would take man's word over the Bible. Of course, everything Pastor Rick Warren says here about homosexuality is absolutely correct, because like doing drugs or abusing alcohol being gay is a behavioral choice, that's it, simple and done:
Appearing on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight last night, influential megachurch pastor Rick Warren said that being gay is like consuming poisonous arsenic… or having the desire to punch a man in the nose. Like homosexuality, both things are “natural,” Warren said, but we should never act upon them. 

After a tense exchange over homosexuality and whether it is biological, Warren admitted that “it wouldn’t bother me if there was a ‘gay gene’ found,” because regardless of whether we deem it “natural,” it is still wrong. 

He explained: “I have all kinds of natural feelings in my life and it doesn’t necessarily mean that I should act on every feeling. Sometimes I get angry and I feel like punching a guy in the nose. It doesn’t mean I act on it. Sometimes I feel attracted to women who are not my wife. I don’t act on it. Just because I have a feeling doesn’t make it right.” 

“Not everything natural is good for me. Arsenic is natural,” he concluded.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Jamie Foxx Blurts Out How Black Liberals Really Think, Calls Barack Obama "Our Lord and Savior"


Indeed, with Black liberals assisting termendously in Barack Obama's re-election a few weeks ago, give talented comedian/actor/singer Jamie Foxx credit for just telling the truth: for merely existing as a half-Black, two-term President, in the eyes of many naive and ass-backwards-thinking Black liberals, Barack Obama has replaced Jesus Christ as their "Lord and Savior", furnishing "great gifts" in the form of record food stamps, welfare, unprecedented unemployment loot and a host of other entitlements. Lazy Black liberals would never give that up and they certainly didn't come out in force for Obama again this year because Barry cares about real needs in the urban community. Props to Jamie Foxx for giving truth to power:
Oh, Jamie Foxx

The comedian caused quite a stir at the 2012 Soul Train Awards, which was televised last night but taped in Las Vegas a few days after the 2012 election, when he made an out-of-this-world comparison regarding the president.

"It's like church over here. It's like church in here. First of all, give an honor to God and our Lord and Savior Barack Obama. Barack Obama," Foxx said to the audience.

The president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights in the United States Bill Donahue released a statement regarding the actor's comment, saying, "Foxx's epiphany is startling. It just goes to show that even though Obama did not succeed in stopping the oceans from rising (as he promised to do in 2008), he did succeed in convincing Jamie Foxx, and no doubt legions of others, that God exists. Whether God can survive an ACLU lawsuit accusing him of violating church and state grounds remains to be seen."

Foxx's rep was not immediately available for comment.
RELATED: Hannity Panel Battles Over Jamie Foxx Calling President Obama ‘Our Lord And Savior’

Monday, November 26, 2012

Politiks As Usual: In The News 11/26/12

Black Friday Shopping Hits A New Record 

More Congressional Republicans Break Tax Pledge for Sake of Looming Fiscal Crisis 

U.N. Declares Contraception Basic Human Right

Pressure Building For Immigration Amnesty

Exit Polls Prove US Still a Red State Nation

WashPost Celebrates Turkey Day By Saying 'Great Day to Come Out as Gay'

HuffPo Posts Video of San Fran’s ‘Famed Celebration of Fetish, BDSM’

One Third Of Schools Receiving Stimulus-Funded 'Student Improvement Grants' Showed Declines

Planned Parenthood Ran a Black Friday Deal

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

5 Deep Insights Gained from Watching Hoarders

Race Rants Over Rice

NBC News Stopped Gay Rights Group From Releasing Chelsea Clinton Ad, According To Report

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Thanks to Angry Radical Feminism Women Aren't Women Anymore And They're Chasing Men Away


FOXNews.com:
What angry, radical feminism has brought us (besides more lesbians that is):

The battle of the sexes is alive and well. According to Pew Research Center, the share of women ages eighteen to thirty-four that say having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives rose nine percentage points since 1997 – from 28 percent to 37 percent. For men, the opposite occurred. The share voicing this opinion dropped, from 35 percent to 29 percent. 
Believe it or not, modern women want to get married. Trouble is, men don’t. 

The so-called dearth of good men (read: marriageable men) has been a hot subject in the media as of late. Much of the coverage has been in response to the fact that for the first time in history, women have become the majority of the U.S. workforce. They’re also getting most of the college degrees. The problem? This new phenomenon has changed the dance between men and women. 

As the author of three books on the American family and its intersection with pop culture, I’ve spent thirteen years examining social agendas as they pertain to sex, parenting, and gender roles. During this time, I’ve spoken with hundreds, if not thousands, of men and women. And in doing so, I’ve accidentally stumbled upon a subculture of men who’ve told me, in no uncertain terms, that they’re never getting married. When I ask them why, the answer is always the same. 

Women aren’t women anymore. 

To say gender relations have changed dramatically is an understatement. Ever since the sexual revolution, there has been a profound overhaul in the way men and women interact. Men haven’t changed much – they had no revolution that demanded it – but women have changed dramatically. 

In a nutshell, women are angry. They’re also defensive, though often unknowingly. That’s because they’ve been raised to think of men as the enemy. Armed with this new attitude, women pushed men off their pedestal (women had their own pedestal, but feminists convinced them otherwise) and climbed up to take what they were taught to believe was rightfully theirs. 

Now the men have nowhere to go. 

It is precisely this dynamic – women good/men bad – that has destroyed the relationship between the sexes. Yet somehow, men are still to blame when love goes awry. Heck, men have been to blame since feminists first took to the streets in the 1970s. 

But what if the dearth of good men, and ongoing battle of the sexes, is – hold on to your seats – women’s fault? 

You’ll never hear that in the media. All the articles and books (and television programs, for that matter) put women front and center, while men and children sit in the back seat. But after decades of browbeating the American male, men are tired. Tired of being told there’s something fundamentally wrong with them. Tired of being told that if women aren’t happy, it’s men’s fault. 

Contrary to what feminists like Hanna Rosin, author of The End of Men, say, the so-called rise of women has not threatened men. It has pissed them off. It has also undermined their ability to become self-sufficient in the hopes of someday supporting a family. Men want to love women, not compete with them. They want to provide for and protect their families – it’s in their DNA. But modern women won’t let them. 

It’s all so unfortunate – for women, not men. Feminism serves men very well: they can have sex at hello and even live with their girlfriends with no responsibilities whatsoever. 

It’s the women who lose. Not only are they saddled with the consequences of sex, by dismissing male nature they’re forever seeking a balanced life. The fact is, women need men’s linear career goals – they need men to pick up the slack at the office – in order to live the balanced life they seek.