Blacks Will be Hurt the Most by Obama Win

Politicaloutcast.com:

One again, Blacks voted for Obama in “mass quantities.” Some put the number at 95 percent, although I’ve seen a number around 92 percent. The Black vote in the Philadelphia wards was off the charts. One article carried this headline, “Vote was astronomical for Obama in some Philadelphia wards,” even though another article reported in September of this year that “[p]overty rose significantly in Philadelphia and its surrounding counties over the last two years, while the city’s median household income in 2011 ranked second-worst among the nation’s 25 largest cities.”

These areas are deeply affected by policies that are championed by the Democrats. Have the majority of blacks benefited by decades of calls for more poverty programs and and wealth transfer incentives? When you have time, read the article “Philadelphia’s Poverty Problem” that was published online in PhillyMag in 2010. It’s heart wrenching:

More than a third of the city’s kids don’t graduate from high school . . . . Sixty percent of the city’s children are born out of wedlock. A third grow up in poverty. Philadelphia, recent stats say, is America’s poorest big city.

Which hurts all of us. Consider the problems just on a practical level: It’s tough to attract new business to the city when so much of it is dangerous, when we lack an educated workforce.

We lose out on tax revenue. We end up spending more — billions more — on prisons and services trying to resurrect our poorest people than we would in tackling some of their problems head-on.

No doubt some Blacks break free from the conditions that they were born into, as the above article points out. They beat some very bad odds, but they are expected to stay with the liberal insistence that a strong central government managed by caring political party is their way out of poverty, and woe to any “minority” who says otherwise. Black and Brown people who support Republicans are said to be “window dressing.”

Remember how Stacey Dash was savaged by blacks for her support of Mitt Romney? Consider these comments by Joy-Ann Reid, an on-air contributor at MSNBC:

They just think they need to put more window dressing on it, and find some more black and brown people to say the exact same things they believe. They don’t believe they need to change their positions on issues. They just believe they need to change the decoration.

 RELATED:  Black Voters Made Lasting Impact On Historic Election

Was Hurricane Sandy God's Wrath For New York Passing Gay Marriage?

Of course, anti-God liberals are blaming faux-global warming for Hurricane Sandy. But considering that global warming has been disproven over and over and over again (along with the fact that most social liberals are atheists) and New York recently sanctioning unGodly "same-sex" marriage, it's a wholehearted question to wonder if the two might be related:

Pastor Luke Robinson of the Quinn Chapel AME Church in Frederick, Md., told a crowd of gay marriage opponents that Hurricane Sandy struck and devastated parts of New York City last week as part of God’s judgment for the city’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg making a monetary donation to the campaign to defend Maryland’s law allowing same-sex marriages.

“Here was the mayor of New York giving a quarter of a million dollars, coming down to Maryland discussing the matter,” said Robinson, according to audio posted by the Washington Blade. 

“While he’s here somebody whispers in the ear, ‘You better go back home and protect your stock because God is sending judgment.’ The thing came through the area. You have to understand the season and the time.

It’s almost the end of hurricane season, but God sent one of the biggest hurricanes ever.”

The pastor was referring to Bloomberg’s October donation of $250,000 to the campaign to uphold Maryland’s new same-sex marriage law.

Robinson conceded that his own state of Maryland was badly damaged by the hurricane, but he told the crowd that they were spared the same level of New York damage: “The storm came through here, but for the glory of God the storm didn’t tear us up because we got that hope for us. There are people who are praying for us. There are people who believe in God, we [are] going to turn it around.”

RELATED: Gov. Cuomo blasts Rabbi for blaming Hurricane Sandy on gay marriage

Jared Loughner Sentenced to Life for Arizona Shootings

Good, this monster will never get to taste freedom again:

Gabrielle "Gabby" Giffords stood next to her husband in court Thursday as he spoke directly to Jared Loughner, the Arizona man who tried to assassinate the then-congresswoman in a January 2011 shooting.

"Mr. Loughner, you may have put a bullet through her head, but you haven't put a dent in her spirit and her commitment to make the world a better place," former astronaut Mark Kelly said.

Giffords was seriously wounded when Loughner walked up and shot her in the head during her meet-and-greet event with constituents outside a Tucson grocery store on January 8, 2011. A federal judge, a congressional aide and four others were killed and 12 other people suffered wounds.

U.S. District Judge Larry Burns sentenced Loughner to serve the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole. The punishment includes seven consecutive life terms plus 140 years.

"The evidence clearly shows that he knew what he was doing, despite his mental illness," the judge said.

Loughner, 24, spoke just once, confirming to the judge that he would make no statement before sentencing.

"That is true," he said.

Beside the dramatic appearance by Giffords and her husband, nine other victims spoke at the sentencing hearing held in a packed federal courtroom in Tuscon.

Kelly, in an interview Thursday evening with CNN's Piers Morgan, said hearing what they had to say "was really a tough thing" for Giffords.

"Gabby said afterwards, for her the biggest emotion was just sadness," Kelly said. "To hear story after story of what the impact of this horrible day had on people was really difficult."

Takeaway From Last Night's Election: Glorious Night For Anti-God, White, Social Liberals

Still getting over the shock, but here's my takeway from last night's election results:

1) Huge win for white, social liberals. Their mascot, Barack Obama, gets another 4 four years to further their anti-God, immoral, abortion by any means, "civil rights" for people who choose to have sex with people of the same sex, "civil rights" for illegal immigrants, pro-union at any cost, pro-"climate change", pro-victimhood agenda.

2) When Obama won Nevada, a state suffering some of the worst unemployment and housing foreclosure rates in the nation, you just knew it was not going to be Mitt Romney's night.

3) Yes, Hurricane Sandy did have an effect on the election. To think, the week before the hurricane hit Romney was leading in most polls. Then Sandy came, killed many, destroyed homes, etc., and a nation came together, saw the clips on TV (including POTUS supposedly "leading the charge" to recovery) and a certain, severely obese governor of New Jersey (and supposed Romney advocate) empirically embracing Obama like he was the second coming of God--yeah, optics can be very influential.

4) Dick Morris and Karl Rove should never, ever, ever be allowed to predict anything when it comes to politics.

5) It's hard enough to beat an incumbent, but Romney did himself no favors by playing it safe in that 3rd debate. He had plenty of opportunity to look presidential and go after Obama on Libya. predator drones killing American citizens, Gitmo still being open, etc. But he didn't and that's incredulous when you consider how much momentum he gained after clearly winning the first debate.

6) I don't know the stats, but libertarians probably cost Romney some key votes. I know Ron Paul never endorsed him and Paul is the leader of that lot so I imagine that a lot of them stayed home.

7) The black liberal vote made a difference in North Carolina, but not Pennsylvania, the latter of which Romney needed badly. At least some blacks in North Carolina are capable of thinking for themselves.

8) Elizabeth Warren beat Scott Brown. Allen West might be out. Some gay, white chick won a Senate seat. "Same-sex" marriage won in Maine. Yeah, those are huge victories for the white, morally bankrupt, "progressive" lot and they're loving it.

9) The Christian-Right needs to get their shit together...and soon. Clearly, Barry's team ran a better ground game and considering all that they were up against (high unemployment, the after-effects of ObamaCare, etc.) for them to still win is frankly speaking...amazing.

10) More gridlock. With the GOP gaining more seats in the Senate, anyone expecting real "change" in DC anytime soon is in either serious denial or just stupid. But that could actually be good for conservatives come 2014 and even 2016 when God forbid, Joe Biden runs.

5 Reasons To Vote For Mitt Romney

RELATED: Why Obama should want a loss on Tuesday

Former Drug Dealer & Obama Supporter Jay-Z Replaces 'Mitt' for 'B-tch' While Singing at Obama Rally

These are the vile, morally bankrupt, celebrity liberals that Barack Obama hangs around with:

Rapper Jay-Z while performing at an Obama campaign rally in Ohio Monday substituted the name "Mitt" for the word "b-tch" in the lyrics to his song "99 Problems."

Before doing so, he told the crowd he didn't get it vetted by the campaign

JAY-Z: And I changed this one up. I have to do it. I’m sorry. I didn’t get clearance from the Secret Service. So if they come tackle me here, y’all save me. I changed the lyric of this song, it goes like this: “If you're having world problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 problems but Mitt ain't one." I didn’t get that vetted, so let’s do this real fast before they come up here and snatch me off this stage.

For those unfamiliar with the song, the real lyrics are, “If you're having girl problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 problems but a b-tch ain't one."

Classy, huh?

RELATED: Obama Calls Romney a ‘Bullsh**ter’

Politiks As Usual: In The News 11/5/12

Matthews Unaware ‘Revenge’ Was Obama’s Line, Insists Romney Stoking Ethnic Fears With ‘Revenge’ Theme

Sandy Broke Records -- And Hearts

Why I Think Obama Will Win — In Detail

The Argument For School Choice

Commander in Chief Fails Military Voters, Again

Obama Campaigns with Celebs as Sandy Devastation Continues

Savannah Guthrie: Hurricane Sandy Sent 'Seemingly From Above' to Help Obama Get Re-elected

One Of Most Disgusting, Offensive Things I've Ever Seen, Courtesy Of Michael Moore

NAACP Takes Over Houston Polling Station, Advocates for President Obama

Former Hillary “Top Aide” Endorses Romney

Harry Reid Says Working with a President Romney is 'Laughable'  

New York Daily News Endorses Mitt Romney After Endorsing Obama In 2008

Wow, one of my hometown papers, in a decidedly blue state no doubt, does the right thing:

America’s heart, soul, brains and muscle — the middle- and working-class people who make this nation great — have been beset for too long by sapping economic decline.

So, too, New York breadwinners and families.

Paychecks are shrunken after more than a decade in which the workplace has asked more of wage earners and rewarded them less. The decline has knocked someone at the midpoint of the salary scale back to where he or she would have been in 1996.

Then, the subway fare, still paid by token, was $1.50, gasoline was $1.23 a gallon and the median rent for a stabilized apartment was $600 a month. Today, the base MetroCard subway fare is $2.25, gasoline is in the $3.90 range and the median stabilized rent is $1,050, with all the increases outpacing wage growth.

A crisis of long duration, the gap between purchasing power and the necessities of life widened after the 2008 meltdown revealed that the U.S. economy was built on toothpicks — and they snapped.

Nine million jobs evaporated. The typical American family saw $50,000 vanish from its net worth, and its median household income dropped by more than $87 a week. New Yorkers got off with a $54 weekly hit.
Our leaders owed us better than lower standards of living, and we must have better if the U.S. is to remain a beacon of prosperity where mothers and fathers can be confident of providing for their children and seeing them climb higher on the ladder.

Revival of the U.S. as a land of opportunity and upward mobility is the central challenge facing the next President. The question for Americans: Who is more likely to accomplish the mission — Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?

Four years ago, the Daily News endorsed Obama, seeing a historic figure whose intelligence, political skills and empathy with common folk positioned him to build on the small practical experience he would bring to the world’s toughest job. We valued Obama’s pledge to govern with bold pragmatism and bipartisanship.
The hopes of those days went unfulfilled.

Achingly slow job creation has left the U.S. with 4.3 million fewer positions than provided incomes to Americans in 2007. Half the new jobs have been part-time, lower-wage slots, a trend that has ruinously sped a hollowing of the middle class.

The official unemployment rate stands at 7.9%, marking only the second month below 8% after 43 months above that level. Worse, add people who are working part-time because they have no better choice and the rate leaps to almost 15%. Still worse, add 8 million people who have given up looking for employment and the number who are out of jobs or who are cobbling together hours to scrape by hits some 23 million people.

Only America’s social safety net, record deficits and the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented low-interest policies have kept the label Great Depression II on the shelf.

New Yorkers have fared no better. The state is alone among the 50 in suffering significantly rising unemployment over the last 12 months, with the rate now at 8.9%. The city’s pain index is 8.8%, and the five boroughs have been trading down in salaries.

To me in order for Mitt Romney to win a few things have to happen: 1) less enthusiasm for Obama now then in '08 leads to less voter turnout, esp. in the so-called battleground states, 2) Tea Party voters who helped lead the 2010 midterm revolution, need to be there for Mitt come Tuesday, 3) pragmatism, what with all of Obama's broken promises and the fact that we are worse off than we were 4 years ago, voters (not including brainwashed Obamabots who will vote for Obama come hell or high water) need to vote with their conscious as well as a love for their country and see that this country needs to be steered in a new direction.

RELATED: Nothing to laugh about, Mr. President