The case of Bradley Manning is something conservatives need to rally around if they want to defeat Barack Obama in November. Manning, a gay activist and soldier angry that his chosen, abnormal and deviant lifestyle of homosexuality was suppressed under the old "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law (signed by former-Democrat President Bill Clinton), chose to betray his country, assist our enemies and risk the lives of hundreds of thousands of military personnel (as well as their friends and families) by providing classified documents to Julian Assange's Wikileaks website. Obama, an "evolving" supporter of the homosexual lifestyle as well as gay marriage, made repealing DADT a top priority in his agenda, but has said little about Wikileaks, much less acknowledged the threats we face because of Manning's criminal actions--probably because he's too afraid of pissing off his mostly-white, immoral, liberal base that has openly supported Manning. In other words it's not too hard to connect the dots here:
Pfc. Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army soldier accused in the biggest leak of intelligence documents in the military's history, was formally charged Thursday.
Aiding the enemy is a capital offense, but prosecutors are not seeking the death penalty. If convicted on all the charges, Manning will likely face life in prison. The 24-year-old is suspected of giving hundreds of thousands of secret documents to the WikiLeaks website.He was arraigned Thursday at Fort Meade, Maryland, before military judge Col. Denise Lind, marking the beginning of the court-martial process.
Manning, who sat in his dress uniform with his hands clasped throughout the arraignment, deferred pleading guilty or not guilty to the charges until a later date. He can enter a plea any time before the start of the trial.
The charges against him include aiding the enemy, wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the Internet, transmitting national defense information and theft of public property or records.
Manning's counsel also deferred choosing how the case will be tried. In a military court-martial, there are three options from which the defendant can choose - trial by a military judge, trial by a panel of senior officers or trial by a panel that includes one-third of enlisted noncommissioned officers.
Holding off on entering a plea and choosing a forum for the trial could be part of the defense's overall strategy, according to Capt. John Haberland, a legal spokesman for U.S. Army Military District of Washington.
The defense could be waiting to see the outcome of various motions, Haberland said.
Motions were submitted at the arraignment, mostly dealing with information gathering for the defense, Haberland said. A hearing is set for March 15 and 16, where it is expected the defense and prosecution will be able to argue their motions.
A trial start date has not been set. The prosecution asked for the trial to begin August 3, but the defense would like the trial to begin no later than June.
If the prosecution gets its way, Manning would be in "pretrial confinement for over 800 days before the trial begins," said Manning's civilian attorney, David Coombs, arguing for a speedy trail.