Thursday, October 06, 2011

Bill O’Reilly Debates Atheist Author: Judeo-Christian Belief Is A Reality ‘On Which This Country Is Founded’



Mediaite.com:
On Wednesday night’s The Factor, host Bill O’Reilly spoke with atheist author Richard Dawkins about his latest work, The Magic of Reality, which is “partially aimed at children,” as O’Reilly described it.


During their conversation, O’Reilly summarized the book’s aim as encouraging its readers to focus on science (which the host applauded) at the expense of God and religion — an assessment with which Dawkins took issue. “No, this is a book about science,” said Dawkins. “It doesn’t talk about God.” O’Reilly wasn’t buying it. “It mocks God,” he said. “I looked at it.” But Dawkins insisted that the book includes no mockery of the sort.


Later on in the discussion, however, O’Reilly gleefully shouted “A-ha!” when Dawkins referred to, in this instance, Christianity as a myth on par with Aztec or Egyptian mythology and belief. O’Reilly responded by calling Judeo-Christian belief not a myth but a reality “on which our country is based” — an idea that Dawkins seemed to find entirely absurd.


O’Reilly then brought up the idea that the worst regimes in history were “atheistic,” pointing to dictators like Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. “That has nothing to do with whether you believe in God or not,” Dawkins insisted, adding that he didn’t want to enter into a “shouting match” over who is “more evil.” “Are we shouting?” asked a rather amused-looking O’Reilly.

1 comments:

  1. I suggest Mr. O'Reilly read a history book by Oxford historian James Parkes (The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue). Educating yourself about your own faith will help you understand each other.

    Since Hellenist gentile Christianity with its 4th-century redacted NT, was antinomian (anti-Torah) from its birth (in 135 CE -- intractably contradictory to the 1st century Torah-teaching Pharisee Jew Ribi), this necessarily implies their own supersession and displacement of Judaism and Torah. Ergo, the term Judeo-Christian is an oxymoron. So arguing who is and who isn't a non-existent oxymoron will never get anyone anywhere. (One could correctly use the phrase "Jewish and Christian" or "Jewish or Christian," as appropriate.)

    ReplyDelete