Monday, July 04, 2011
California Public Schools To Soon Receive Lessons On Gay History
It's what the gay mafia continues to do so well: milk the civil rights movement of the 60's for all there is and equate race to their sick, immoral sexual urges. Whether its defending "gay marriage" by pointing at laws that once opposed interracial marriage or getting their own "Gay History Month", for liberals/gay activists there's been nothing better to pushing the gay agenda than likening it to the rights blacks fought and died for decades to receive. And the fact that it's a gay, white male who's leading this latest fraud shouldn't fool you either.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
The rise of the homosexual movement is a textbook example of societal morality devolving into societal amorality and ultimately immorality. The rationale behind societal amorality is the myopic question: "How does my immoral behavior hurt you?" The answer is: It may not, in the short term. Yet when society sanctions degenerate homosexual behavior – well, that does hurt me. If millions of people accept the deviant as normal, that reshapes society in vastly destructive ways. A homosexual's moral self-destruction may have no consequences for me specifically, but destruction of societal standards always has consequences. When the stigma left single motherhood, society felt the sting in rising rates of single motherhood and juvenile crime. When the stigma left sexual licentiousness, society felt the sting in rising rates of teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted disease, emotional emptiness and nihilism. Immoral homosexual personal behavior may not personally affect me, but exempting their immoral behavior from societal scrutiny certainly does. A society without moral standards is an unhappy, unhealthy society - a society with no future...and all of us have to live in that society.
ReplyDeleteIn an effort to affect public policy and gain acceptance, the assertion often is made that homosexuals deserve equal rights just as other minority groups—and should not be punished for, or forbidden from, expressing their homosexuality. The fight for the acceptance of homosexuality often is compared to civil rights movements of racial minorities. Due to America’s failure to settle fully the civil rights issue (i.e., full and equal citizenship of racial minorities), social liberals, feminists, and homosexual activists were provided with the perfect coat tail to ride to advance their agenda. Using this camouflage of innate civil liberties, homosexual activists were able to divert attention away from the behavior, and focus it on the rights. The crux of the problem is Afro-Americans are a race, and women are a gender - homosexuality is neither - and therefore incomparable. Until the nature verses nurture argument is settled in favor of nature, homosexuality will be perceived as a choice by many and a choice does not elicit "rights" by any means. Even then the behavior - which IS a choice - will always be subjugated by the standards and morals defined by a given society.