"The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way. The result could be not only the loss of the lives of U.S. soldiers, as a result of the enemy understanding U.S. intelligence sources and methods, but damaged relations with Afghanistan and Pakistan and a possible U.S. military defeat in the region as a whole." - Accuracy in Media
The suspect in the leaking of classified military files, Spc. Bradley Manning, voiced his disgust with US Army commanders and U.S. "society at large" on his Facebook page just prior to his alleged downloading of thousands of secret documents, according to the British news media.According to one story appearing in Britain's The Telegraph, Manning, who served as a US Army intelligence analyst, became depressed after a break-up with his homosexual campanion. He also wrote: "Bradley Manning is not a piece of equipment," and quoted a joke about "military intelligence" being an oxymoron.
Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: "Bradley Manning didn't want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast."
The 22-year old Manning is awaiting court martial as the primary suspect in the leaking of more than 90,000 secret documents to Wikileak.org creator Julian Assang, who in turn posted the documents on his web site.
The secret documents subsequently appeared in major U.S. newspapers in a security breach which Pentagon officials say has endangered the lives of serving soldiers and Afghan civilians.
So thanks to this poor sissy breaking up with his boyfriend, our military secrets are now wide open for our enemies to view and our soldiers, out there fighting for our country, are at a greater risk. And what radically-leftist President with a 41% approval rating has been out and front on overturning DADT again?
Posts
This is why we should not allow gays in the military. They are mentally unstable and morally bankrupted which makes them a hugh risk in military operations and military life. I know this from personal experience.
ReplyDeleteKeep your homophobia to yourself.
ReplyDeleteThis site is really dedicated to hating fags, so I think I know the appropriate website for you and the anon to vent on. www.godhatesfags.com. Really, when Republicans lie and say they're not homophobes, they'll have to take into account that you have a section to what you call the freaking "gay mafia"! They'll give you an offer you can't refuse, all right. I wonder how you'd kick it off with GayPatriot. You claim not even to be a republican, but you take so much of their extreme rhetoric, such as hating fags, for instance.
ReplyDeleteI mean, the way you people always portray "gay activists" (a very sneering, unfortunate word) as wild-eyed queers/fags out to rape your children and get married, it can definitely offend regular people, out to live their lives but they can't. I'm just saying, this site has a lot of articles out to hating queers, and saying you aren't a homophobe after some of the nasty rhetoric used against gay people is a cop-out. By attacking fags, you're attacking a lot of people, part of the human race, who think just like you and I do. I would advise you against using Fred Phelps's rhetoric about a "gay mafia" and "wild-eyed HATEFUL and mean for standing up for themselves instead of letting themselves get kicked around and bullied fags who would rape your children in a heartbeat". I'm not trying to pull an ad hominem on you, but I would advise you do the same against an entire group of regular people who don't all think as a collective. Maybe I shouldn't bother, but I wouldn't consider myself a troll.
ReplyDeleteWhen are you heterohaters going to get it; We don't fear you. There is a big difference between contempt and fear.
ReplyDeleteWhat a waste of digital space. You repeat the tripe from "Telegraph"? They make Rush Limbaugh look like a liberal.
ReplyDeleteROFLMAO
The leaks have begun. So far, the secrets revealed have been very embarrassing to important American dignitarires, but not dangerous. I'm pleasantly surprised by that. I have yet to read about anything that's a threat to American soldiers or national security. There has been a lot of speculation about the contents and who could be put in danger. The worst may be to come and we won't know that for days. All we can do is wait and see.
ReplyDeleteThat aside, why would the military let an inexperienced 22 y/o private have access to such sensitive material in the first place? One would expect that only high-ranking officers would be allowed near it. It raises questions about how well the military vets its members.
Yeah chuck all the gays out of the military cos they can't fight and instead put all the niggers in there cos all they do is kill and fight, thats all their good for.
ReplyDeleteManning had shared everything with a former so called leader slash hacker .who responded by covering everything up .when later exposed she was shaped on the wrist and then nothing .she was in charge of opp. How fair is that Kim ...
ReplyDelete