Saturday, December 20, 2008

TIME Magazine Calls Barack Obama A Bigot


John Cloud, writing for the TIME, makes it clear that Obama's selection of Rev. Rick Warren for his Inaugural invocation makes the
president-elect a "bigot":

Rick Warren may occasionally sound more open-minded than Jerry Falwell, another plump Evangelical who once played a prominent role in U.S. politics. But he's not. Gays and lesbians are angry that Barack Obama has honored Warren, but they shouldn't be surprised. Obama has proved himself repeatedly to be a very tolerant, very rational-sounding sort of bigot. He is far too careful and measured a man to say anything about body parts fitting together or marriage being reserved for the nonpedophilic, but all the same, he opposes equality for gay people when it comes to the basic recognition of their relationships. He did throughout his campaign, one that featured appearances by Donnie McClurkin, a Christian entertainer who preaches that homosexuals can become heterosexuals.

Obama reminds me a little bit of Richard Russell Jr., the longtime Senator from Georgia who — as historian Robert Caro has noted — cultivated a reputation as a thoughtful, tolerant politician even as he defended inequality and segregation for decades. Obama gave a wonderfully Russellian defense of Warren on Thursday at a press conference. Americans, he said, need to "come together" even when they disagree on social issues. "That dialogue is part of what my campaign is all about," he said. Russell would often use the same tactic to deflect criticism of his civil rights record. It was a distraction, Russell said, from the important business of the day uniting all Americans. Obama also said today that he is a "fierce advocate for equality" for gays, which is — given his opposition to equal marriage rights — simply a lie. It recalls the time Russell said, "I'm as interested in the Negro people of my state as anyone in the Senate. I love them."

Of course, the major irony with this smear piece is that Obama was, unsurprisingly, just named TIME's "Person of the Year". But the hypocritical wrath of the Left is what should be noted here: you just can't win with the loony wing, there's no room for compromise, either you're totally with them or against them. On the campaign trail Michelle Obama tirelessly championed "gay rights", Obama himself has gone on record supporting civil unions, wants to repeal "Don't ask, don't tell" and opposes a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. But now a gay, leftwing scribe calls Obama a "bigot" because he dares to invite a noted pastor to bless his presidency. Again, liberals are tolerant only if you agree with their point of view.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Body Remains Are Caylee Anthony


This story has fascinated me from the very beginning so yeah, this news is really disturbing:
The remains found in a wooded area last week in Orange County, Florida, are those of Caylee Anthony, authorities confirmed at a news conference Friday.

"It is with regret that I'm here to inform you that the skeletal remains found December 11 are those of the missing toddler," said Dr. Jan Garavaglia, the Orange County medical examiner.

The remains were confirmed to be Caylee's through a DNA match, authorities said.

Garavaglia said the cause of death was homicide, but she could not determine how Caylee was killed.

Casey Anthony, 22, faces charges including first-degree murder in the June disappearance of her daughter. She could face a sentence of life in prison if convicted. Prosecutors said this month that they would not seek the death penalty.

Authorities said they called the jail where Anthony is being held to let her know about the discovery.

Caylee's remains were found last week a half-mile from Casey Anthony's parents' home, in the area where a meter reader first directed police.

At the news conference, Garavaglia said that the remains were completely skeletonized and that no tissue was present. She said there was no trauma to the bones before Caylee's death.

Planned Parenthood Protects Rapists



When you're too busy making billions from the uterus' of young women, who cares if some of them might've been raped or not.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Barack Obama Doesn't Have To Defend Rick Warren


The hypocritical "tolerant" crowd is up in arms over Barack Obama picking Pastor Rick Warren to conduct the invocation on Inauguration Day. Mind you, Warren wasn't chosen for a Cabinet position, he's doing an oath for chrissakes. And like most priests who follow and represent what they're, yunno, taught from the Scripture, Warren doesn't support abortion or gay marriage. So if you're a simpleton member of the Left, all this means that Rick Warren is a bigot and Barack Obama, once the most liberal member of Congress, suddenly doesn't support "equality" and must be stopped at all costs:
President-elect Barack Obama this morning defended his choice of evangelical megapastor Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at next month's swearing-in, saying that although he differs with the conservative pastor on social issues, he wants to have diverse voices at the ceremony.

"I am a fierce advocate of equality for gay and lesbian Americans. It is something that I have been consistent on, and I intend to continue to be consistent on during my presidency," Obama said at a morning news conference to announce several financial appointments. "What I've also said is that it is important for America to come together, even though we may have disagreements on certain social issues."

Gay rights advocates and progressives denounced the decision to associate with Warren, an outspoken opponent of abortion rights, same-sex marriage and stem cell research, immediately after inaugural organizers announced the lineup for the ceremony yesterday.

The Human Rights Campaign sent a blistering letter to Obama (D) in which it called the choice of Warren "a genuine blow" to gay Americans, who supported Obama overwhelmingly in his race against Republican nominee John McCain.

No doubt since most liberals don't believe in God anyway, they'd probably all vote for tossing out the invocation altogether.

Illinois Supreme Court Will Not Remove Rod Blagojevich


NYTimes.com:
Any prospect that the saga over Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich’s contested hold on power might end swiftly evaporated on Wednesday when the State Supreme Court refused to hear a request to remove him, and Mr. Blagojevich’s lawyer made it clear at an impeachment inquiry here that the governor had no intention of going quietly.

Without comment, the court denied an emergency request from Lisa Madigan, the state’s attorney general, to consider removing Mr. Blagojevich from office as well as a motion for a temporary restraining order that would have immediately stripped Mr. Blagojevich of many of his powers, including the authority to appoint someone to fill the United States Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama.

The ruling stirred consternation among some lawmakers here, many of whom had seen the request to the court as the fastest, straightest route to Mr. Blagojevich’s departure, even if a bit of a long shot.
Good. Madigan's attempt to get the governor ousted was nothing more than a weak, vindictive move by an attorney general whose long disliked Blagojevich. In fact Madigan's well-known desire to one day be governor herself presents a clear conflict of interest that should force Madigan to remove herself from this entire matter. As we're seeing with Obama pal Jesse Jackson Jr. proving to be a snitch for the Feds and Rahm Emanuel, Barack's new chief-of-staff, having had multiple talks with Blago about Obama's Senate seat, this scandal is just opening up as Inauguration Day inches closer and closer. Barack certainly doesn't want this mess still hanging over his head when he starts his presidency. Bottom line, Rod Blagojevich is being scapegoated to protect Barack Obama from the stink of corruption that's long festered in the president-elect's home town and state. And that's why Blagojevich needs continue to fight these allegations and not resign.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Barack Admonishes Journalist For Daring To Ask About Blagojevich Scandal


Liberals have long accused the Bush administration as being the most secretive in recent history, whining for days on end about the President's supposedly unfair treatment of the press in it's reluctance to share information with the public esp., when some sort of scandal involving the White House is present. Well, Barack Obama isn't even president yet and we're already getting an idea as to how Obama's will treat the press when he's in the hot seat:
During his press conference announcing new Education Secretary designate Arne Duncan on Tuesday, Barack Obama lectured Chicago Tribune reporter John McCormick "I don’t want you to waste your question" when he tried to press the President-elect on whether Obama told the truth when he said they were taking a "very hands-off approach" to his Senate replacement.

Media liberals noticed how much this sounds like their nominee for Worst President Ever, but they’re already arguing that criticizing Obama for lecturing the press for tough questions is premature. In Wednesday’s Washington Post, reporter/columnist Dana Milbank took issue with Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard: "Obama has proved himself to be far more willing to take questions than Bush, and if he makes good on his promise to release the full account of his aides' Blagojevich ties -- even on Christmas Eve -- it will be a major improvement in transparency over the current administration."

Surely if the journalist had Obama what he thought about Bill Richardson cutting his beard off he wouldn't have "wasted" his question.

Scam Artist And Democrat Donor Bernard Madoff Reminds You Of Jack Abramoff


Newsbusters.org:
The wires services and the rest of the Old Media have also been reporting on a scandal that doesn't have to do with Illinois Governor, Rod Blagojevich. But, like the Blago story line, the media seem to be forgetting one small aspect of the story of Wall Street rip off artist Bernard Madoff. Like Blago, Madoff's connections to the Democrat Party seem to be of little interest to the media.

Very few media stories of the fraud perpetrated by former Nasdaq chairman Madoff mentions the heavy financial support that Madoff has donated to the Democrat Party. Campaign contributions by Madoff show many thousands of dollars going to Democrat candidates and causes. Including $100,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign, thousands to Charles Rangel (D, NY), Charles Schumer (D, NY), and $6,000 to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. Madoff also gave generously to Senator Frank Lautenberg (D, NJ) who runs a charitable foundation that invested with Madoff.

With the money that Madoff spread around in contributions is it really surprising that his actions went ignored by regulatory agencies?

In any case, the media seems wholly uninterested in the fact that Madoff is a big Democrat contributor. I found no mention of Madoff's past support of the Democrats in any of the following stories.

Word has it too that many in the Hollywood Left were victimized by Madoff's schemes. Oh, the irony.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Rod Blagojevich Won't Resign, Good For Him


UPI.com:
Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich will not resign but will fight federal corruption charges against him, his attorney said Monday.

Attorney Ed Genson told reporters in Chicago, shortly after meeting with Blagojevich Monday evening, that the governor will not resign.

"He's not stepping aside," Genson said "He hasn't done anything wrong. We're going to fight this case."

The Illinois House voted 113-0 Monday to open impeachment proceedings against Blagojevich, who was arrested last week on federal charges stemming from an alleged effort to sell the U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama to the highest bidder.

Democratic House leaders in the state capital decided, however, against immediate consideration of a plan to strip Blagojevich of his authority to appoint someone to serve the remainder of Obama's Senate term, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Good for Blagojevich. Chicago Democrats are just trying to scapegoat Blago in the hope that all this whole mess blows over, thus removing the stink surrounding Barack Obama and all his corrupt friends. From Tony Rezko to Rev. Jeremiah Wright to William Ayers, this scandal is the start of four years that could make the Slick Willie years serendipitous by comparison. How in the world are all of Obama's Chicago homies, mentors, partners and associates so shady, yet Obama, born from this lot of corruption, is left to run the country with the most powerful job in the world? God help us all.


Monday, December 15, 2008

Politiks As Usual: In The News 12/15/08


Iraqi Journalist
Throws At Shoes At President Bush

Sarah Palin's Church Hit In Suspected Arson Attack

Playboy Apologizes For 'Cover' Of Nude Virgin Mary


More Americans, Rich And Poor, Pawning Items To Make Ends Meet

Minnesota Ballots: Land Of 10,000 Fakes

Anti-Gay Marriage Bullying = 'The Epitome Of Intolerance'

Pro-God Messages To Counter Atheist Bus Ads In Baltimore

Nickelodeon Indoctrinates Global Warming In Video Game

Texas Taxpayers Spent $678m On Illegals' Healthcare

Chicago Tribune Stopped Working With Prosecutors, Forced Arrest Of Gov. Blago Early

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Struggling Liberal Rag Newsweek Rallies For Gay Marriage By Mocking The Bible


The Christian Messenger:

AS its cover story for the Dec. 15, 2008 issue, the editors of Newsweek offer readers a one-sided propaganda piece about Scripture and ‘gay marriage’ entitled ‘Our Mutual Joy’ written by Religion Editor Lisa Miller.


According to Miller, “scripture gives us no good reason why gays and lesbians should not be ... married--and a number of excellent reasons why they should.”

Miller restricts her research to ‘scholars’ supportive of homosexual unions and exaggerates discontinuity between Scripture's marriage values and our own. She elevates distant analogies like slavery and haircuts over close analogies, with far more points of correspondence, like adult-committed incest.


She also extrapolates, from certain ‘universal truths’ in Scripture, illogical conclusions that would have appalled the scriptural authors, like assuming that generic love is a sufficient prerequisite for sexual relationships. Moreover, she systematically ignores virtually every significant counterargument to her claims.

For example, she claims that Jesus never ‘explicitly defines marriage as between one man and one woman.’


She overlooks the fact that Jesus not only affirmed a male-female prerequisite for marriage but also predicated his argument about the ‘twoness’ of a sexual bond (monogamy) on the twoness or duality of the sexes in Genesis 1:27; 2:24. Miller contends that Jesus’ singleness and remarks about marriage as a secondary good indicate Jesus’ openness to non-traditional forms of sexual bonds. They actually signify the exact opposite: a further limiting of options for sexual relations to one person of the other sex for life.
No surprise here, Newsweek was always been a rag that caters to the leftwing plantation. I do my part to protest their hate for conservatives by never buying an issue. Indeed, it's just sad that people who support gay marriage can't do so on its own merit, without ridiculing the Bible and Christianity. By the way Newsweek didn't turn in a profit during 2008 and is currently cutting staff, print size and circulation numbers. Ain't karma a bitch.

Other's Blogging: AlbertMohler.com, Powerline, NewsBusters, twoorthree.net